This meeting was announced and chaired by Smith Kennedy. These minutes were prepared by Ira McDonald with much help from Smith Kennedy.
- Review agenda and state PWG IP Policy - Ira McDonald as minute taker - Agenda after review: (1) Administrivia (2) License agreements for GitHub repositories? (3) Running motions in PWG WG meetings (4) Drupa presentation content review (5) Liaison engagement with other 3D printing organizations (6) Promoting PWG membership to 3D printing domain companies and individuals (7) SC consider including the schemata policy document generated by the SM workgroup as a general PWG policy document
- Review of PWG IPR policy - All attendees already familiar with it - Review minutes of SC on 18 February 2016 - Approved as posted - Review of recent action items - See 'Previous Action Items' below
- Discussion - GitHub supports a number of different licenses including MIT and 2 flavors of BSD, Apache, Artistic - Mike and Ira both recommend using an MIT or BSD (both enterprise friendly) - Which license to use? - Ira recommends we read / review the MIT, BSD 2 clause, and BSD 3 clause - Read/review MIT, BSD 2-clause, BSD 3-clauseACTION: SC members to read / review the MIT, BSD 2 clause, and BSD 3 clause
- Discussion - "SM3"? "semanticmodel"? - Decided on "pwg-semantic-model" - Hold off on creation of repository until license flavor for repo is decided
- Discussion - Smith cannot remember any motions being run in a WG meeting - It would always be done within a meeting itself - Smith saw a statement in the Process 3.0 that says there are voting rights that are achieved within a particular working group - BUT - Voting has actually always been done using a PWG Formal Vote where all PWG voting members can vote via email - Consensus - SC concurs that individual work groups must not do an internal WG vote (only straw polls or other non-binding consensus mechanisms) - Non-issue, but good discussion
- Dusseldorf, Germany on 05/31/16 to 06/10/16 - Leslie Wood replied that they're holding a place for PWG on 01/27/16 - 15-minute talks scheduled at 2:30pm on 06/03 and 06/06 - Discussion - Paul sent a couple of drafts of abstract text for Drupa presentation on 03/02/16 (along with Anne Price's comments) - SC reviewed the email entitled "Drupa Draft Text for Discussion at this Thursday's SC Meeting" - Suggestions that longer paragraphs should be converted into bulletized lists - Anne Price suggested articulating the benefits of a standards-based approach (and a bulletized list for this as well) * Faster TTM - OS generic drivers * Interoperability * [remove as premature topic] Access to cert programs * "Best ideas as vetted by WW experts" --> "Use ubiquitous IPP technology" * [come up with better phrasing for these bullets?] - Discussion about how connectivity works - Between PC / Mac and printer via USB could use IPP over USB - So network and local printers could have the *same* interfaceACTION: Paul to work on a second draft with bulletized versions of the last 2 paragraphs and another block of bullets for the value prop of standards-based approach
- Discussion - Call for Objections could be run in the SCACTION: Smith to issue an SC Call for Objections on adopting the SM schemata policy document (5-7 working days duration)
- Discussion - 3MF Consortium - align on job ticket formats or PWG format alternative inclusion? - Ira suggests we don't pursue formal liaison using the ISTOACTION: Smith to reach out to the 3MF officers to inquire about PWG collaboration
- Discussion - Good idea, but needs some thought about mechanisms
- NEW TIME for SC - Thursday at 12pm Eastern! - SC - Thursday 17 March 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern - plans for April PWG F2F - SC - Thursday 31 March 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern (tentative) - plans for April PWG F2F