This meeting was announced and chaired by Smith Kennedy.
These minutes were prepared by Ira McDonald with much help from Smith Kennedy.
- Review agenda and state PWG IP Policy - Ira McDonald as minute taker - Proposed Agenda: (1) Administrivia (2) Discuss open action items (3) PWG site account registration (4) GitHub site account registration (5) Hosting of OpenPrinting website on PWG server? (6) Scheduling Call with Pete Basiliere - Gartner 3D Printing Analyst (7) PWG Staff Job Descriptions first draft (8) Call for Objections Policy Document (9) August F2F
- Review minutes of SC on 30 June 2016 - Approved as posted
- Review actions of SC on 30 June 2016 - see Previous Action Items below
- Discussion - Added HCD PP topic to second morning (for European callers) - Updated schedule and added missing IPP topics - Kept dates as 23-24 August 2016
- Discussion - Smith gave Daniel instructions on how to register
- Discussion - Smith sent invites to Ira and Paul
- Discussion - PWG to fund a separate VPS on Linode and work with Till to get that configured - Mike to get this new VPS added and notify Jane / ISTO that the PWG's bill will go up - Separate topic: Should we construct a new "openprinting@pwg.org" and / or Open Printing WG for increasing communications cadence and awareness between PWG and OpenPrinting? - Smith to add discussion of this topic as a slide / topic for the August F2F plenary
- Discussion - 2:30pm Eastern 07/14 - Paul Tykodi initial call w/ Pete Basiliere to check with Gartner about their analysis / study and keep them "on topic" - Lots of silos and apples & oranges processes observed - Paul to ask if another meeting can be scheduled where the broader SC can attend to have a dialog
- Discussion - Ira posted first draft based on initial thoughts from Smith - Bill sent feedback asking for more detailed descriptions (good feedback)ACTION: Smith / Ira to respond with more detailed/descriptive roles and responsibilities for PWG Staff Job Descriptions
- Discussion - We basically use the IEEE Call for Objections process - can we simply reference the IEEE process? - Is the process for updating Process 3.0 that onerous? - If not, let's try to get this and other stuff into a Process 4.0?ACTION: Smith to send out a query to the SC to request recommendations for what to add to a Process 4.0 update, and use that to create a first draft of Process 4.0 in time for the August F2F
- Discussion - Announcement was sent - 6 respondents to survey - 2.5 attendees attending in person thus far (1 person only for 1 day) - Consider virtual F2F since there is such a light list of physical attendees? - Should we have a threshold for physical attendees that would decide whether to virtualize the F2F?ACTION: Smith to request more respondents for August F2F
- SC - Thursday 28 July 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern - SC - Thursday 11 August 9am Pacific / 12pm Eastern (tentative)